Wavel AI vs Descript

The ultimate solution for AI based video subtitles and content promotion

Wavel.ai is completely an AI based tool that help businesses to optimise their video and audio content by adding subtitles and multi-lingual voiceovers to the videos that are posted by us on our social media platforms. It also helps us in editing our videos and make them more efficient for instagram reels and youtube shorts for better reach. Wavel.ai helps in doing voice cloning to the audio that we use in these contents just in few minutes. There are lots of advanced features like global language support and voice inhancer or cloner and these features can only be accessed by premium plan also for working with these features the user need to learn about them and practice using them on a day to day basis so the quality of results does not get affected.

Shaik U

Good editing software, but transcription needs work for accents

Descript makes it easy to edit any audio or video file. If you're used to working with Microsoft Word, especially, then you'll feel at home with Descript. Made an error? Edit the text, and your audio is updated too. Much like any automated transcription service, Descript struggles with non-neutral accents. So, for example, my Scottish accent means I still need to go in and tidy up at least 50% of the transcript, sometimes more. This can make any time saved on other features moot. I would really like to see more work put into regional accents.

Danny B.

Wavel.ai has impressive AI voiceovers

I was happy with its realistic AI voiceovers, their support during problems and multilingual support as well which makes it an ideal tool for content creators like us who need a high quality voice generation for work or use and its ease of use, implement and integration was a cherry on top.

Chiranjeevi n

I like Descript - it would be nice if it weren't so memory intensive

It saves me a ton of time in editing! I appreciate the thoughtfulness in design. It tells me there was a lot of energy put into understanding what podcasters need and I appreciate that. I like the removal of filler words and I like the auto captioning function. Descript is very easy to use. I like the transcript function and the ability to edit it and the audio at the same time simultaneously. It makes my life so much easier. It crashes my pc way too often, and I have a powerful gaming machine with a lot of memory. This stops my work and stresses me out. I do wish navigating the playhead back and forth was easier. The whole application just freezes if I scroll too fast and it this slows me down, especially when I'm in a pinch for time.

Adele W.

A Reliable AI for Sound and Voice Needs.

The voice cloning ability is one of its outstanding ones in Wavel.ai. It can mimic the voice of a person with such precision that it can accurately reflect the tonal variations as well as the impassioned modulation of a person. The speed and the performance of the tool in processing audios are also good; very time-saving for the content producers. Wavel.ai is really easy for implementation and let's say that both types of people, beginners and professionals, can easily use the software. Hence with so much functionality and easy integration, the customer support is enabling within the platform, calling for frequent visits by users to the platform.

Peter M.

Saves so much time

Since switching to Descript, I'm able to edit my podcast episodes myself, in wayyyy less time than I thought it would take me. Like - 2 hours on average per episode? And we're talking completely edited, video AND audio versions, with the AI features helping generate show notes, title, transcript (for a blog) and pulling out 5+ snippets for repurposing as short-form video content. Descript makes it easy to turn one hour of recording into a full week (or more) of marketing content. And I absolutely love that. Sometimes there are still (small) chunks of my video that descript maps words to incorrectly, but this is usually after I've been editing quite a bit, so may also just be user error. And it's correctible using the manual correction feature, so not a big issue.

Oliver W.